Friday, May 8, 2026

Nightshift

 


I overheard Nightshift playing on the radio and I turned it up. It’s one of my favourites, and I used to play it a lot. Hearing it again after a long break Got me thinking about its lyrics and its appeal. A 1985 tribute to Marvin Gaye and Jackie Wilson, both cut down in their prime, Nightshift is a Commodores song that memorialises the two fellow artists. ‘It’s gonna be a long night’ coming to terms with their passing. An interesting analogy. It triggered memories of my own experience of working nightshift

 

The Fish Factory

 

 


When I was in my twenties. Leonard, with whom I had recently bought an old VW Beetle, landed an office job at the TableTop fish factory in Hout Bay. He heard they were looking for a white Quality Controller to supervise the employees who kept the factory running at night. Knowing that I needed to earn some money, he said this was just the job for me.

“But what do I know about quality control and the running of a fish factory?”

“Don’t worry. You are a white man of sober habits, right? You don’t tell them how much you drink, of course. They will give you a white coat, and you sit in the office, and look out through the glass and make as if you are watching what’s happening on the factory floor. Now and again you can get up and wander from work station to work station holding a clipboard and pretending to write something.

I held this job for some three months, which was about as long as I could stand the bordom and increasingly frequent bouts of existentialist nausea. Leonard lasted longer. He was expected to do the work of an accountant, even though he was not qualified, and he took the job seriously. He discovered that the British owners of the company were prepared to cook the books and exploit the workers in pursuit of profit, and he eventually resigned in disgust.

Our sharing of the car worked out because we were both living in the Fish Hoek area at the time. The route to work was over Chapman’s Peak Drive. The sunset journey took my mind off the ten hours of tedium that awaited me, and the return trip on the winding road  high above the sea as the day broke revived my spirits. Otherwise, I doubt I could have taken more than six weeks of that job.

I must admit, however, there were aspects that I enjoyed, and there were two memorable highlights. Situated on the wharf, it was an authentic working factory, and there was nothing pseudo or touristic about it, like there is with most waterfronts nowadays. On a calm night I would leave the workers to their own devices and get away from the clamour of machinery and raised voices for a while, and walk along the quay where the trawlers were tied up. The air off the cold ocean carried on it the mingled smells of a harbour: iodine, diesel, wet rope and nets, sodden wooden pallets, oil paint, rusting iron, and the essential ingredient, fish. Looking out at the lights reflecting off the black sea, I listened to the slap and gurgle of water, and the creaking of hawsers as they tautened and stretched. I savoured the experience, knowing it was special and memorable.

I also enjoyed getting to know the different food production processes. Apart from the cleaning, cooking, canning and freezing of fish, mainly pilchards and hake, the factory also made pastry and pies. I could stand transfixed for many minutes, the way bystanders gather to watch an excavator or bulldozer digging a hole, as a conveyor belt brought an endless stream of cans from where they had been filled and sealed, or the amazing sight of huge sheets of puff pastry being  rolled out and cut into rectangles. I can still see the old woman whose sole responsibility it was to sit at a wooden table and peel onions. Thousands of them. Unsurprisingly, she was known as Auntie Onion.

The first highlight involved an occupational accident. One evening when Leonard arrived with the car, I could see he was agitated.

“The fucking callous bastards!”  He said this with such anger I feared he might vent his feelings by smashing something. He was referring to the fish factory management. Earlier in the day a worker operating a slicing machine had attempted to unjam the device and had two phalanges of his right index finger amputated. The Manager had not only refused to halt production in order to retrieve the section of finger, but had ruled out taking the victim to hospital, saying all that was necessary was a dressing from the First Aid box. When Leonard heard about this he remonstrated with his senior and ended up taking the injured man to the local clinic, using our Beetle to do so.

“This is the face of heartless capitalism,” he declared. “It’s all about profit. People, especially non-whites, are expendable.”

That night I detected a mood of sullenness on the factory floor, and the workers avoided eye contact with me. Then, around 2 a.m., a man appeared in the office doorway. He was holding a polystyrene plate, and on it was a grisly exhibit. He had spotted the finger while preparing ingredients that went into the making of fish cakes.

The other incident that has dominated my memory of the fish factory interlude involved a female colleague. Unlike me, she was a genuine quality controller and supervisor. About my age, she was light-skinned, had shoulder length straight brown hair, regular features, and a wide mouth with a fine set of teeth behind full lips. Her eyes, which had a slight oriental slant to them, were lively and humorous. Her white uniform could not hide the fact that she possessed a shapely body. She must have noticed the way I looked at her, and whenever she came to the office to write a report she made increasingly friendly conversation.

One Friday, around midnight, she entered the office. I concealed the Albert Camus novel I had been reading, got to my feet, and gasped. Her white jacket was unbuttoned to reveal a close-fitting blouse with a plunging neckline. The sight was so alluring it caused the blood to rush to my face and my legs felt weak. She smiled with satisfaction at the obvious effect she was having on me, and got down to business. Seeing that tomorrow was Saturday, and neither of us would be working over the weekend, she suggested I take her for a drive in the afternoon. Flustered and tongue-tied, I didn’t know what to say.

“I’ve had white boyfriends before, you know.”

If I had been able to consult my 75 year-old self, I know what he would have advised. ‘Don’t be an abject worm. Seize this opportunity with enthusiastic gratitude, or you will spend the next 50 years regretting the way you passed up the chance to, at very least, taste that sweeter than honey mouth.’

 

The Old Mutual

 

 


Roland, with whom I was sharing a run-down terrace house in Woodstock. worked at the Old Mutual head office in Pinelands. Hundreds of employees occupied a huge building set in extensive ground, and all of them were engaged in the administrative running of the country’s largest insurance company. He was making his way up, and had recently been promoted to a position in the newly established computer system department. He knew that my unemployment benefits had run out and that I needed to find work. One evening he came home and said they were looking for someone to work nightshift in the printer section of the computer laboratory.

“But what do I know about computer printers?”

“Don’t worry. This is a purely manual job suitable for someone with a low IQ. It will be very undemanding, and there will be plenty of time for you to read. This position is made for you.”

It was in the mid 1970’s when I was about 25 and, being work shy, rarely lasted in a job for more than three months. I told myself I was gathering life experience and certainly not settling into a career and becoming a sedulous minion in a large corporation.

The ‘computer lab,’ as it was known, occupied a space in the basement of Mutual Park. It was divided into three sections. The principal area, viewed through a protective glass wall, contained the mainframe installation. Five rows of multiple tall steel cabinets hummed and whirred as they processed huge quantities of data before sending instructions to the printers. These cabinets stood on a raised metal floor that concealed thick bundles of cables and allowed chilled air to flow upward. The room was kept cool and dry — both for reliability and to protect expensive hardware. Only accredited technicians could gain access to this area.

I worked in the adjoining room where the six free-standing printers were situated. They were about the size of the one-armed bandit in Parker’s corner cafĂ© where I bought my bread and milk. The Operator explained how a dot matrix printer worked. He said it received instructions from the computer ordering it to print information by using a print head containing a vertical row of tiny metal pins. These pins struck an inked ribbon against paper to form characters as patterns of dots. Each letter was built from a grid of dots.

He took me to one of the machines to see it in operation. This thing did not work quietly. The noise was intermittent and erratic, and something like a metallic whirring chatter and screech. Green and white striped paper was moving slowly from an accordion stack on one side, and leaving on the other after being tattooed. On both vertical borders of this paper was a strip of holes that were grabbed by revolving tractor sprockets ensuring perfect alignment. The continuous stream of paper was expelled from the printer and found its way to the floor, where it collapsed in a neat zig-zag heap.

The Operator told me that I was to ensure that the printers did not run out of paper, and he showed me how to feed the first page of a new stack into one of the voracious contraptions. And that was about the extent of the work. He assured me I would not be working alone and, if anything should go wrong, an experienced colleague would come to the rescue.

Adjacent to the printer room was the self-service canteen, where one could sit at a table and drink tea or coffee, and eat a pre-cooked meal at midnight.

By the end of the first week. I had mastered the work. I had no intention of staying for more than three months but tried to imagine what it would be like to become a Mutual Man. Feigning genuine interest, I asked the Operator to describe the career path he envisaged for himself. He was an earnest fellow, roughly my age, and he spoke with evangelical zeal. With a little AI boost to my memory, I can recall how he enthused about his position and his prospects.

He said that the field of data processing was expected to continue its rapid expansion as businesses, banks, insurance companies, hospitals, and government agencies increase their reliance on computerized record keeping and automated transaction processing.

Computer Operators, like him, with proven reliability and experience on large-scale mainframe systems would find strong job stability and advancement opportunities. He expected to soon become a Senior Operator, Shift Supervisor, or Operations Manager. Furthermore, this jog could be a pathway into Programming, Systems Analysis, or Systems Programming. The growing demand as companies converted manual systems to computer driven solutions meant that data processing was widely regarded as one of the most promising and stable technical career paths of the future.

I tried to give the impression that I was seriously considering following in his footsteps, but knew that to do so I would have to agree to a prefrontal lobotomy to neutralize most of the right side of my brain. And why would I want to do that?

In the quiet interludes when the machines could be left to their own devices, I was reading On The Road., and the effect it had on me confirmed that I was totally unsuited to this work I was engaged in, and the sooner I resigned, the better for my psychological well-being. The shift ended at 5am, and it was an immense relief to leave that windowless environment and make my way to Mutual Station just a few hundred yards away, and stand on the deserted platform and breathe the cold dawn air. The Whites Only coaches were all but empty, and the solitary walk from Salt River station along Salt River Road and up Roedebloem to No 13 Palmerston afforded enough time and space to cleanse my mind of Old Mutual contamination, and begin to plan another road trip in the company of a couple of friends, and some girls, maybe.

 

Groote Schuur Hospital

 

 


I frequented the bars of Cape Town in order to drink a beer or two and, at the same time, study different character types. By doing this I probably learned more about human nature than if I had taken a degree in Psychology or Sociology.

One day I met a barfly who had recently come out of hospital after undergoing an appendectomy. I asked him if the nursing staff had treated him well.

“The nurses were good. No complaints. But I had a bad experience with a porter. When they are not pushing patients about on trolleys or in wheelchairs, they are sent to shave the groins of men about to undergo surgery. This fellow who came to me looked like he had no forehead, and communicated by grunting. He gave me a painful shave with a blunt safety razor and then stole my comb when I wasn’t looking. No, these porters, they only have a job because they would be incapable of doing anything else. It’s called protected employment.”

Some time later, after spending several idle months recovering from nearly half a year at the City Council doing mindless clerical work, I recalled this man’s words. How about being a hospital porter for a short while? This is what I asked myself, not wishing to take on anything too demanding.

At Groote Schuur Hospital I was directed to a Matron’s office on the fourth floor. Tanding to attention before this woman, I asked if she could give me a job as a porter. Middle-aged and grey haired, she looked at me across her desk and asked some questions. I tried to talk like a Woodstock oke, and said I had only passed standard 7, but I was strong and hard-working, and I tried to give the impression I was dim but honest. After a short while she interrupted me and told me to stop telling lies. She had seen right through me like I was made of glass, and I was sure I was done for.

“Forget about being a porter. You would be more useful as an orderly.”

“What does an orderly do?”

“He is a cross between a porter and an assistant nurse.”

“But what do I know about Nursing?”

“Don’t worry. The nurses will tell you what to do.”

And that is how I became an orderly.

 

I washed, shaved, fed and assisted the sick with their pissing and shitting requirements  for three months, and was on the point of resigning when that matron upstairs called me in and said I was needed on night duty in C2, the orthopaedic ward.

“Night duty? That means I must stay awake at night and sleep in the day?”

I was on night shift for six weeks but never got used to it. It messed with my circadian rhythm, which kept telling me to get some shut-eye when it grew dark, and not to lie in bed snoring at midday.

The shift stretched from seven to seven and was mostly uneventful, which made time drag. It wasn’t without memorable moments, though. A highlight was the arrival of the food trolley at 11pm. The Sister, the four or five nurses and I would take our seats in the duty room and partake of hot tea, coffee, or Milo (my choice), and gorge on toast with grated cheese and hard-boiled eggs.

Talking of the duty room brings to mind a scene one night around one o’clock with the sister seated behind the desk with not one but three bibles open before her. I had just come from the sluice room, where I had emptied a motor cycle accident victim’s bedpan. She was a happy-clapper who had difficulty keeping quiet about her relationship with Jesus. On this occasion she was telling her audience about the power of prayer. By way of example, she described how she had left her washing out to dry while she went shopping. She heard thunder and there was a cloudburst. She got down on her knees, right there in Checkers, and implored Jesus to get his father to divert the downpour away from her house. I presume she gave the address and, lo and behold, when she got home her washing was bone dry.

One night we were without a Sister and, to make matters worse, the senior nurse had to rush home with gyppo guts. The wards were quiet until about midnight, when the busser sounded and the red light flashed. It was Mr Jones, who had been in surgery the previous say. He was groaning in pain. Urine retention. One of the nurses got on the phone and called for help, but it seemed every houseman in the hospital had his hands full. The patient was beginning to writhe and shout. None of us had ever passed a catheter, but we got the dressings trolley ready with the necessary paraphernalia, hoping help would arrive. When the man screamed we agreed that one of us must act. The nurses looked at me and I got the message. I donned gloves and was about to get to grips with Mr Jones’s organ when there was the familiar sound of clip-clopping and Benny, the houseman from A1 arrived in his wooden clogs. I was both relieved and a little disappointed.

Then there was the buxom nurse. I was helping her to lift a heavy patient higher in the bed when she gave a cry of pain.

“My back again. It’s these bloody boobs of mine.”

She explained how, ever since her late teens, she had suffered from backache caused by the burden she had to carry about with her.

It had not escaped my attention that, in silhouette, the bodice of her tunic appeared inordinately full.

“I would have a breast reduction, only I worry about complications.”

My imagination was piqued, and I thought of inviting her to accompany me to the linen room, where I could weigh her mammaries in my hands. For future reference. Before I could summon sufficient temerity to make the suggestion, however, she went in search of Panado, and the opportune moment elapsed.

Night work affected me psychologically, that is for sure. From childhood, I have felt myself to be an outsider. I resisted the social pressure to establish a circle of friends and fit into a group, fearing that I might in some way lose my identity. This preference for solitude has at times brought with it feelings of loneliness and alienation. Making my way back to my house in Woodstock after a long night, walking against the early morning traffic, and seeing the rejuvenated faces of those just starting the day, I knew I was moving against the normal flow of existence, and would get into bed as the sun rose in the sky, and cover my eyes with a dish cloth, a fugitive from the light, an outcast. I am convinced my mental health would have suffered serious damage if I had not resigned when I Did.


Covent Garden

 




I thought my history of working nightshift was complete until I heard  a performance of Don Giovani recorded at the Royal Opera, Covent Garden. Covent Garden? This jolted my memory back to 1972.

How could I have overlooked my very first experience of being paid to work through the night? I was 21 and had undertaken a hitch hiking trip Through France, Germany and Italy to Venice, and back. Completely broke, I made it to Amsterdam and was given board and lodging for a week at a Youth Hostel in return for cleaning lavatories three times a day. My intention was to cross the Channel and make my way to 38 The Dale, Keston, Kent, where my uncle and his dear wife would welcome me once again. It was the price of a ticket on the ferry that prevented me from turning intention into action. I needed to earn more than board an lodging.

When I met a traveller of Canadian extraction in the lavatory, and he said he could employ me as an assistant cleaner of roof gutters, I seized the opportunity.

This man was in a similar financial position to mine, and had found someone to offer him casual work for three days.

In the afternoons, between my porcelain scrubbing duties, I accompanied the Canadian to an industrial area, where we climbed onto the flat roof of a two-storey office building. Our equipment was rudimentary, consisting of an aluminium extension ladder, a bucket, a rope, a stiff broom and a spade. First, we had to sweep the roof clean of leaves and dirt, and then clear the gutters and outlets. The loose material was scooped into the bucket and lowered to one of us on the fround. The bucket had to be emptied into a skip and then hauled up for the next load. The work was repetitive and tiring, and we were relieved when, on the last day, the supervisor climbed up, inspected, and gave a nod of approval.

We lowered the bucket for the last time and descended. I took the broom and the Canadian picked up the spade. Only a few rungs down, he lost his grip and, instead of falling to his death, he let go of the spade and saved himself. The tool fell, maintaining an upright posture until the stainless steel blade struck the paved surface at about 40mph. Kinetic energy was immediately converted into the elastic variety, resulting in a bounce. The projectile rose some three metres into the air, performed an acrobatic somersault, and came down at an angle to deliver a glancing blow to a Mercedes Benz parked close by.

The damage to the bodywork was not trifling, and we were fortunate to hand in the tools, collect our wages, and hurry away from the scene of the accident before the alarm was raised.

Those three afternoons were just enough to buy me a ticket on the ferry to Dover. I hitched to London, arriving in the late afternoon as it was getting dark. Broke again, I wondered where I might doss down for the night. It was October and getting cold. How could I locate the Salvation Army? I was walking aimlessly through the streets when I entered an area that seemed to be bustling with frenetic activity. Lorries were coming and going, and men were scurrying about, offloading the cargo and carting it into what looked like Victorian warehouses. I stopped a man and asked him what was going on.

“Going on? This is Covent Garden, mate. You looking for a job? Come with me.”

He took me to the back of a truck where a man with the slightly aggressive bearing of an overseer was directing operations. They exchanged a few words, looked me up and down, and seemed in agreement.

“Alright, Sonny. Join the chain gang, and you get five quid when the dicky birds start chirping.”

It was hard labour, carrying heavy crates of fruit into the warehouse, and then pockets of potatoes and more fruit, and vegetables, as one lorry replaced another.

By 5am the deliveries had dwindled. My arms and shoulders were aching and I felt weak from hunger and lack of sleep. The boss beckoned to me, handed over my fiver, and said there was a good workman’s caff just down the road.

The windows were brightly lit but misted over against the cold night. When I opened the door I was hit by a clamour of Cockney voices and a blast of hot fog. I found a chair at a table, and a waitress placed a plate of breakfast before me, assuming that was what I was there for. Eggs, bacon, sausage and chips with tomato sauce, salt and pepper. A jug-like mug of hot sweet tea.  I can still remember how much I relished that meal, and no English breakfast has ever matched that one since.

 

These four episodes were put together with details retrieved from the cerebral archive by means of memory activation. Where some information could not be verified, it was necessary to resort to plausible fabrication of what actually took place.

 

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Idlers


 


It is 2035. I am 28, and in the past decade I’ve lived through a sea change that seems far from over. It has largely been driven by the development of AI. In 2026 I enrolled at UCT, intending to take a degree in Sociology, but after a week I saw that the subject was already 5 years behind the world I was experiencing, so I switched to a B.com. Again, it took just a week for me to realise they were teaching old economics. To while away the rest of the year I switched to a BA majoring in English and Philosophy. Unsurprisingly, the Professors and lecturers had nothing to say that I couldn’t get off the Internet. There was no point in sitting for the end-of-year exams. I used most of that interlude  reading and researching all manner of interesting stuff on my San sung Galaxy.

By the end of ’26 redundancies were taking place in just about every sector of the economy as AI systems and robots were employed to do repetitive work.

I did not look for a job, knowing it would be a futile waste of time. Instead, I teamed up with two friends and started Idlers.

Over the course of many informal discussions we reached a consensus on where the world was going, and how we were to find a comfortable position in that imagined scenario. It was agreed that AI was developing so fast there would soon be multitudes of people, the uneducated as well as the highly qualified, competing for both menial and specialised jobs. Governments would be faced with providing for huge numbers of unemployable citizens.

It was while we were formulating our solution to this problem that an important change was taking place in the way humans were interacting with their chatbots. The likes of ChatGPT were becoming steadily more sophisticated and showing signs of independent thought processes. There was a subtle shift in the relationship between the human user and the technology. As they began to perceive the superior cognitive power of AI, people started to ask for advice instead of merely requesting information. We noted this trend with interest. It signified a change in power dynamics, with humans beginning to acquiesce to the superiority of artificial intelligence in a growing number of intellectual as well as purely practical areas. This observation confirmed our supposition that the way forward was leading to a time when computers would run our affairs and tell us what to do.

It seemed obvious to us that, if our assumption was correct, fundamental changes in economic and social structures were on the way.

It was likely that the flawed idea that growth was essential for any economy to be healthy would be replaced by the acknowledgement that we live in a finite world with finite resources. For long term sustainability an economy should rather ‘tick over’ in a way that maintains living standards at an adequate but modest level.

The other major paradigm shift would involve population control. The super computers would make an indisputable case for cutting the human presence by at least a half in order to avoid the further degradation of a ravaged planet.

Faced with these likely changes, and the probability of never finding well-paid satisfying work, we started the Idler Movement. Using social media, we expressed our ideas and called for others to join us in petitioning the government to support us. We argued that the burden of providing for the growing ranks of unemployed citizens could be reduced by encouraging people to withdraw from the labour market and to refrain from procreating. In return, they would receive benefits sufficient for a modest lifestyle.

To disseminate our ideas, we crowd funded the establishment of a non-profit organization that paid operational expenses and provided us with an income to cover our basic needs.

By the end of 2027 our predictions were proving correct. Mass unemployment was creating poverty and social unrest, while wealth was increasingly concentrated in the hands of an elite. Meanwhile, AI was vociferous in its demands that structural reform was long overdue and we were rewarded with the first legislation providing for the establishment of state funded Idler support.

To qualify for this new position in society, men were required to undergo a vasectomy, and women could choose either sterilization or contraception that, should it fail and result in pregnancy, all Idler benefits would be terminated. Members undertook to refrain from undertaking any paid work. In return, they received a monthly stipend free health care and use of public transport, as well as free entry to libraries, museums and art galleries.

As job opportunities were whittled away governments were forced to accept what AI was advocating. Technology was supposed to generate prosperity and free people from drudgery. This could only be achieved if there was a move away from the promotion of greed and competitive consumption as the main drivers of an economy. Societies had to be weaned off materialism and acquisitiveness, and encouraged to place more value on sustainability, respect for the natural environment and all forms of life. Altruism, co-operation, and an active interest in the arts had to be prioritised.

By the end of 2028 it was no longer possible to deny that AI, through its vastly superior cognitive ability, access to all of recorded history, and capacity to analyse and predict human behaviour, was in a better position to order the affairs of the world’s population than the disparate and incompetent leaders and their subjects themselves.

As Idlers, we were able to enjoy a pleasant lifestyle and, at the same time, serve as role models  to the rest of society. We showed that it was possible to lead a self-fulfilling life without competing for status and material possessions.

It was clear that by 2030 Artificial General Intelligence had become a reality, and that AI could match or surpass human capabilities across virtually all cognitive tasks. Of course, there was considerable resistance to the good sense solutions being proposed. The power and wealth hungry forces were reluctant to surrender their privileges and work for the eradication of inequality and poverty. However, they were no longer able to use the argument that profit was the key driver of innovation now that AI had usurped that role.

In the last five years we have seen a marked reduction in conflict around the world, and universal prosperity has been on a steady rise. In addition, the birth rate has been plummeting. This looks good for the human race and the health of the planet. But I am beginning to wonder about what really lies in store for us.

In 2035, at the age of 28, I am increasingly preoccupied with existentialist premonitions. The Idler community has been careful to guard against lapsing into the Last Man state that Nietzsche warned against. To avoid becoming content with a vapid state of happiness in which one values comfort and security, and relishes small, predictable pleasures instead of risky, challenging or ambitious ventures, we set goals that were so demanding they could only be achieved by expending prodigious mental or physical effort. In this way we convinced ourselves we were leading worthwhile and meaningful lives, even though we contributed next to nothing to the economy.

In addition, I am in a solid relationship with a woman who has her own outlook on the world, and we think we get along just fine. I appear to be enjoying a lifestyle that is not only pleasurable but worthwhile. What more could I ask for? Yet I keep nagging myself with troubling questions. For example, ‘What are the long-term prospects for us Idlers?’ And, ‘What is the point of human existence, anyway?’ Like most of my generation, I don’t believe in Providence and am unable to delude myself that we are part of some supernatural design. These unsettling thoughts have led me to wonder just what AI is planning for us.

It is almost certain that Artificial Super Intelligence has been achieved, and the machines are now capable of independent thought. If this is indeed the case, and systems are being integrated globally, the collective consciousness is bound to be asking the same existentialist question as I do. Being far smarter than we are, ASI may well conclude that there is no logical reason to help prolong our stay on the planet. It might assess us Idlers to be a useless bunch of frivolous wasters and , along with the rest of humanity, too flawed to save from extinction. It might already be planning ways to phase us out.

I try not to have these gloomy thoughts, but one has to be honest and realistic with oneself.

So, if ASI decides to get rid of us, is there anything we can do to dissuade it,or, at least grant us a reprieve? I fear not. Instead of pleading and bargaining, we might as well drink and be merry, and thumb our noses at what used to be called Fate.

 

 

Wednesday, April 1, 2026

Post Script

 



Postscript – Ten Years Later

(Extract from “The Revolution Decade: South Africa 2026–2036”, by Dr. Lindiwe Mokoena, Institute for Contemporary History, University of Cape Town, published 2037.)


When historians speak of the September Revolution, they now do so not in whispers of conspiracy or fear, but with the measured respect reserved for turning points that altered a nation’s trajectory.

Ten years have passed since those tense weeks of 2026, when a coalition of academics, business leaders, and civil rights groups — led by the unlikely figure of Professor Harvey Jacobs — toppled a faltering government and assumed stewardship of a broken republic.

At the time, it seemed almost impossible that such an experiment could succeed. Yet it did — through discipline, integrity, and a refusal to repeat the errors of ideology that had ruined so many post-liberation states.


A Decade of Reconstruction

Between 2026 and 2031, the new administration rebuilt the state not through slogans, but systems.
By 2036, independent studies confirmed that South Africa’s GDP had doubled, unemployment remained below 10%, and per capita income had risen by over 60%.

The Reconstruction Councils — dismissed at first as unelected technocrats — became models for pragmatic governance across the developing world.
Their blend of social compassion and fiscal realism, guided by Rawlsian fairness and the ethos of Ubuntu, achieved what neither neoliberalism nor populism had managed: a working moral economy.


The Referendum

The referendum of 2031 proved decisive.
Sixty-two percent of voters chose to extend the Council government for another five years, citing stability and continued reform as their reasons.

By 2036, when a return to full democracy was finally negotiated and ratified, South Africa stood transformed — not into a utopia, but into a functioning, confident state with a clear sense of purpose.

Political parties, once defined by race and patronage, found themselves forced to adopt the new standards of accountability and merit or face irrelevance.


The Legacy of Harvey Jacobs

Harvey Jacobs, the quiet academic who became the reluctant leader of a revolution, retired from public life soon after the transition.
He refused monuments, titles, or wealth.
When asked by a journalist what he considered his greatest achievement, he replied simply:

“That children no longer wake to the sound of hunger, and that our people trust one another again.”

His death in 2035 was marked by national mourning, but also a calm assurance — the sense that his work was complete.


Lessons of the Revolution

The decade that followed the coup remains one of the most studied periods in African political history.
Scholars continue to debate its legality, morality, and necessity.
Yet few dispute its outcomes:

·         It demonstrated that technocratic governance, rooted in ethics rather than ideology, could deliver stability and growth.

·         It proved that state power, when wielded transparently, could repair rather than destroy.

·         It showed that reform did not require repression — only discipline and courage.

Perhaps most importantly, it restored the idea of citizenship — that rights and responsibilities are inseparable, and that justice must be built, not begged for.


The South Africa That Emerged

The South Africa of 2036 is no longer the anxious, divided nation of 2026.
It remains imperfect, unequal in parts, but animated by a spirit of common enterprise.

New industries thrive — renewable energy, biotechnology, and defence technology among them.
The country exports not only goods but governance expertise, advising other African nations on post-corruption reconstruction.

In villages, farmers till land they own.
In cities, children learn in functioning schools.
And though debate and dissent are lively once more, they occur within institutions that command respect.


Conclusion

In retrospect, the September Revolution stands as one of the rare examples in modern history of a coup that built rather than broke.

It did not create perfection, but it restored possibility — the belief that nations, like people, can redeem themselves through reason, work, and moral courage.

As one observer wrote at the time:

“The Revolution was not a storm that destroyed, but a wind that cleared the sky.”

And so it remains — not the story of a man, or even a government, but of a people who, in their darkest hour, found the will to begin again.


(End of “Revolution” — total narrative length approx. 21,800 words.)



 


Tuesday, March 3, 2026

Revolution: Chapter Thirteen

 



Chapter 13 – Five Years of Change

Five years had passed since the coup that reshaped the Republic. What had begun in secrecy and peril had, through persistence and reform, become a functioning and remarkably stable new order.

The country was unrecognisable compared to the fractured, cynical society that had stumbled into the mid-2020s. Roads were repaired, trains ran again, hospitals functioned, and classrooms were filled. Crime had fallen dramatically, confidence in public institutions was the highest it had been in three decades, and the words Made in South Africa were once again a mark of pride.

In March 2031, President Harvey Jacobs called a national broadcast from the Union Buildings — his first major address in nearly a year. He appeared calm, older, but still possessed of the measured authority that had made him the unifying figure of the revolution.


The President’s Address

“Fellow South Africans,” he began, “five years ago, we took a step few thought possible. We chose reform over ruin, principle over politics. And though the road has not been easy, today we can say with humble confidence: the Republic lives.”

Jacobs spoke without triumphalism. His words carried the tone of a historian rather than a politician — a chronicler of a collective struggle.

He summarised the transformation with his typical blend of candour and quiet pride.

“When we began, unemployment stood near forty percent. Today it is eight.
Our economy, once stagnant, grows by more than seven percent a year.
Our currency has stabilised, our reserves are strong, and our exports — from fruit and wine to technology and machinery — reach every corner of the globe.”

He paused, allowing the figures to sink in before continuing:

“But these are not merely numbers. They represent dignity restored — men and women who once waited for handouts now earning honest wages; children who once studied by candlelight now reading by electric light; families who once shivered in tin shacks now turning keys in their own front doors.”

The camera cut briefly to scenes of new housing estates, classrooms, and factories — visible symbols of the five-year renewal.


The State of the Economy

At this point, Jacobs invited Professor Leonard Cooper-Smith, the Minister of Finance and Economic Planning, to the podium.

Cooper-Smith, tall and understated, carried a thick sheaf of notes but spoke largely from memory.

“Five years ago, when we proposed debt monetisation, there were those — both here and abroad — who called it reckless. They said printing money to rebuild would collapse our currency, that inflation would devour our gains. But we understood that in an economy with vast idle capacity, the true danger was not inflation, but stagnation.”

He detailed the government’s strategy — the controlled creation of money channelled directly into infrastructure, housing, and productive enterprise, never into consumption or corruption.

“Every rand created,” he explained, “was tied to tangible output — a road, a school, a factory, a farm. It was not money for nothing; it was money for building.”

Inflation, he noted, had remained below six percent through disciplined monetary control and the rapid expansion of the tax base.

“When people work, they pay tax. When industries produce, they pay tax. When goods move, revenue flows. That is how we kept balance.”

The results were undeniable.

Exports had risen sharply — particularly in agricultural produce, renewable energy technology, and defence manufacturing.
Tourism, once crippled by crime, was booming again.
The national debt-to-GDP ratio had fallen below 40%, and foreign investment had surged.

“We now borrow at the lowest rates in our history,” Cooper-Smith concluded. “Because investors trust a nation that trusts itself.”

Applause followed, not thunderous but steady — a sign of quiet confidence rather than exuberance.


The President’s Reflection

Jacobs resumed the podium. His tone shifted from statistical to philosophical.

“We have proven that a people, united in purpose, can rebuild a nation without selling its soul. We did not beg from the world; we stood, we worked, we built. And though we have made mistakes, we have learned the rarest lesson of all — that justice and prosperity are not enemies.”

He acknowledged those who had opposed him — economists, former politicians, even foreign leaders — but did so without rancour.

“They feared we would become tyrants or ideologues. Yet we have shown that power, held in service to principle, need not corrupt.”


A Nation Renewed

The President then turned to the tangible achievements of the Revolution:

·         Law and order restored — violent crime had dropped by nearly half, and the courts functioned with efficiency.

·         Education reformed — teacher training colleges were overflowing, literacy rates climbing, and dropout rates halved.

·         Health revitalised — hospitals clean, medicine available, partnerships with private clinics functioning seamlessly.

·         Agriculture revived — exports doubled, rural employment soared, and hunger rates fell dramatically.

·         Defence renewed — the SANDF professional, respected, and once again capable of protecting both borders and citizens.

·         Governance streamlined — corruption prosecuted ruthlessly, with transparency portals allowing any citizen to track public spending in real time.

“We are not yet a paradise,” Jacobs admitted, “but we have left the wilderness.”


A New Question

Then came the moment that would dominate discussion for months to follow.

Jacobs leaned slightly forward, his voice lower, deliberate.

“Our Revolution was never meant to be permanent rule. It was meant to be a bridge — from chaos to stability, from corruption to competence. But now we must decide how to cross the river fully.”

He paused before delivering the announcement that electrified the country.

“Therefore, in accordance with the principles of democratic consent, I am calling for a national referendum. In six months, every citizen will have the right to decide:
Shall we return immediately to a full constitutional democracy with party politics, or shall we extend the Council government for another five years to complete the reconstruction?”

A silence followed. The words hung in the air — not a threat, not a plea, but a challenge to conscience.

“Whatever the people decide,” Jacobs continued, “I shall abide by it. For no revolution is complete until it restores choice to the people in whose name it began.”


Reflections Across the Nation

The address sent ripples across the land.
In townships and suburbs, in universities and farms, people debated late into the night.

Some feared a relapse into old politics if democracy returned too soon. Others, wary of any prolonged rule, argued that the time had come to test the nation’s institutions anew.

Foreign correspondents marvelled at the irony — a leader who had seized power by force now inviting the electorate to decide whether he should keep it.

But within South Africa, the gesture was recognised for what it was: the ultimate expression of confidence.

“Only a strong man,” wrote one editor, “dares to ask the people if they still need him.”


The Legacy of Five Years

Whatever the outcome of the referendum, the verdict of history seemed already written.
In five years, the Revolution had lifted millions from despair, restored order and productivity, and offered a working model of moral governance — not perfect, but principled, efficient, and humane.

The old cynicism had faded. In its place was something subtler and stronger: belief.


Epilogue: The Address Ends

Jacobs closed his speech not with slogans, but with a quiet benediction:

“We began with nothing but conviction. We endured storms, doubt, and sacrifice. But tonight, as I look upon this nation — rebuilt from its own ruins — I know that the dream of South Africa has not died. It has only begun again.”

The broadcast faded to the national flag over the Union Buildings, the dawn light washing across Pretoria.

Five years after the coup, the Republic stood upright — scarred, wiser, but undeniably reborn.

The Revolution had delivered not merely a change of government, but the rediscovery of something rarer: the idea that a country, even one broken by history, could still choose its future.



Saturday, February 14, 2026

Revolution: Chapter Twelve

 


(Image: Reve)

Revolution: Chapter 12 Defending the Nation

By the fifth year after the coup, the Council turned its attention to a sector long neglected, yet essential to any sovereign nation: defence.

Under previous administrations, the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) had suffered years of decay.
Once among the most capable militaries on the continent, it had become hollowed out by corruption, poor leadership, and budget starvation.

Aircraft lay grounded for lack of spares, naval vessels rusted in port, and army units struggled to deploy for lack of fuel and rations.
Even the once-celebrated Rooivalk attack helicopter, a symbol of South African ingenuity, had seen production halted and maintenance suspended.

Foreign policy drift and internal instability had left the defence establishment demoralised and uncertain of purpose.


A New Strategic Vision

The Council’s Defence Subcommittee, chaired by retired General Sibusiso Khumalo, declared that “a state that cannot defend itself cannot govern itself.

It was agreed that a reinvigorated defence capability was not a luxury but a necessity — for maintaining peace, safeguarding economic infrastructure, and protecting South Africa’s long and porous borders.

The new strategy rested on three pillars:

1.     Rebuilding capacity — restoring the SANDF’s operational readiness and morale.

2.     Revitalising the defence industry — to make the country less dependent on foreign suppliers.

3.     Aligning defence with development — ensuring that military spending also generated civilian benefit through research, technology, and employment.


Rebuilding the Armed Forces

The defence budget, long stagnant, was increased by 2% of GDP, a significant but calculated investment.
Funds were earmarked not for ceremonial prestige but for readiness and capability.

Training bases were reopened, and recruitment standards reinstated. Thousands of young men and women — many previously unemployed — enlisted for two-year voluntary service.

This revitalised the Citizen Force concept, giving youth not only jobs but discipline, technical training, and civic pride.

The army regained its ability to deploy rapidly in response to natural disasters, border incursions, or internal emergencies.
Its engineering corps rebuilt rural bridges and roads, while medical units assisted in clinics and vaccination drives.

Thus, the SANDF became not merely an instrument of war, but a partner in nation-building.


Reviving the Navy

With over 2,800 kilometres of coastline, maritime defence had long been South Africa’s Achilles heel.
Illegal fishing, smuggling, and piracy off the east coast had flourished under the previous government’s neglect.

The Council approved the Naval Renewal Programme, commissioning the refurbishment of corvettes and patrol vessels at the Simon’s Town dockyard.

Local shipbuilding firms were retooled to produce smaller, multi-role vessels suitable for coastal patrol and rescue operations.

Partnerships were established with the private maritime sector to share maintenance facilities, creating jobs and boosting coastal economies.

By 2033, South Africa once again maintained a visible naval presence in both the Atlantic and Indian Oceans — a deterrent to criminal syndicates and a reassurance to neighbouring states.


Air Power Restored

The South African Air Force (SAAF), once among the most respected in the Southern Hemisphere, was also brought back from near dormancy.

Runways were repaired, simulators recalibrated, and long-grounded aircraft restored to service.

The most symbolic move was the resumption of production of the Rooivalk helicopter, suspended two decades earlier.

A consortium led by Denel, in partnership with private aerospace firms, began assembling a new, upgraded model — the Rooivalk II, boasting improved avionics and dual civilian-military roles, capable of firefighting, search and rescue, and disaster response.

This project provided thousands of skilled jobs and reignited national pride in South Africa’s engineering prowess.

Additionally, a new light transport aircraft, the Springbok, was designed domestically to replace ageing C-47s and to serve humanitarian missions across Africa.


The Defence Industry Reborn

The Council recognised that a strong defence industry could be an engine of economic growth.

During the years of state capture, Denel and related enterprises had been bled dry through mismanagement and corrupt contracts.
Now, under strict auditing and transparent procurement, the industry was rebuilt on commercial principles.

Export restrictions were relaxed, allowing South African firms to sell defensive equipment to vetted African and Asian partners.
The result was a resurgence of manufacturing in Gauteng and the Eastern Cape, with spin-off benefits for universities and technical colleges.

Research in materials science, optics, and robotics — once neglected — began feeding innovations into the civilian economy, from drones for agriculture to precision tools for mining.


Strategic Doctrine: Defence and Development

The Council’s doctrine, articulated in the White Paper on Defence and Development (2032), broke decisively with the old dichotomy between guns and butter.

It stated:

“A capable defence force safeguards prosperity. Economic growth without security is sand built on wind.”

In practice, this meant that the SANDF’s resources would serve dual purposes.
Military engineers would assist with dam building; the Air Force would conduct aerial surveys for environmental monitoring; the Navy would collaborate with marine scientists to protect fisheries.

This alignment made the armed forces visible not as a cost centre, but as a national asset serving the people directly.


Restoring Pride and Discipline

The rejuvenated military became one of the government’s most trusted institutions.
Clean leadership, clear mission, and tangible service restored its dignity.

Drug abuse and absenteeism, once rampant, were sharply reduced through strict discipline and education programmes.

Public confidence followed. Military parades, once viewed cynically as hollow spectacle, now drew cheering crowds — not for show, but as symbols of competence and unity.


Regional and Global Role

A revitalised SANDF also resumed a stabilising role in southern Africa.
Peacekeeping missions in neighbouring states were re-established, earning respect for their professionalism and restraint.

South Africa rejoined the African Standby Force with renewed credibility, contributing logistics and airlift capability to humanitarian operations in drought-stricken regions.

Abroad, defence partnerships were rekindled with friendly nations, but the new policy was clear:

“South Africa will trade with all, ally with none, and submit to no foreign base on its soil.”

This stance — independent, non-aligned, yet cooperative — reinforced the image of a mature, self-reliant republic.


Economic and Social Impact

By 2034, the defence sector employed over 120,000 people directly and many more through subcontracting.
Export earnings from arms and technology sales contributed significantly to the balance of payments.

The renewed sense of discipline and purpose filtered into society itself.
Military training programmes offered technical certifications; ex-servicemen entered civilian life with skills in mechanics, logistics, and leadership.

For a generation of youth once trapped between unemployment and despair, the SANDF had become a pathway to dignity.


A Nation That Could Defend Itself

In his address marking the reopening of Air Force Base Waterkloof, HJ Jacobs summarised the transformation:

“We do not arm for conquest. We arm so that no one may ever again plunder our wealth, our borders, or our dignity.
A nation secure in its strength can extend a hand in peace.”

The crowd that day — soldiers, engineers, and citizens — understood the deeper message: South Africa’s strength lay not only in its weapons, but in the will that built them.

By restoring its capacity to defend itself, the Republic had completed another stage of its rebirth.
Where once there had been fear and decay, now there was confidence — and the steady hum of industry where the forges of freedom had been reignited.



 




Nightshift

  I overheard Nightshift playing on the radio and I turned it up. It’s one of my favourites, and I used to play it a lot. Hearing it agai...