Chapter 1 – The Gathering Storm
By the
middle of 2026, South Africa had reached the edge of systemic failure. The
optimism that had once accompanied the democratic transition had long since
evaporated; the state had become a weary machine running on inertia, its parts
grinding against one another without direction. The July 2021 unrest—remembered
for the burning of malls, the looting of distribution warehouses, and the
paralysis of the security forces—was widely recognised, in retrospect, as the
first visible crack in the post-apartheid order. At the time it was treated as
an aberration, a tragic spasm of poverty and politics; five years later it was
understood as a warning that had gone unheeded.
The years
that followed brought no recovery. Economic stagnation hardened into decline.
By 2026, unemployment officially exceeded forty percent, with youth
unemployment nearer to seventy. Factories that had once exported manufactured
goods to the region stood silent. Mining companies had disinvested after years
of policy uncertainty, load-shedding and labour militancy. The agricultural
sector, starved of rural infrastructure and tormented by farm attacks, produced
barely enough for domestic consumption. Every closed workshop or abandoned mine
meant more job losses, more anger, more disillusionment.
The
once-vibrant townships and small towns of the industrial heartland sank into
despair. In Gauteng and KwaZulu-Natal, informal settlements multiplied on every
patch of open ground. Basic services faltered; water systems collapsed; refuse
lay uncollected. The state’s ability to enforce the law had eroded to the point
where criminal syndicates operated openly, collecting protection fees, running
illegal electricity connections, and controlling minibus routes. For millions
of citizens, government existed only as an occasional announcement on
television.
Business
leaders, academics, and community organisers alike spoke privately of a country
sliding toward chaos. The ANC government had become a monument to patronage.
Cabinet posts were expanded to absorb factional demands, state-owned
enterprises served as instruments of enrichment, and procurement contracts were
traded like political currency. Affirmative-action and empowerment
policies—originally conceived as instruments of justice—had degenerated into
bureaucratic barriers that rewarded connections rather than competence. The
result was not transformation but paralysis.
By 2025,
rolling blackouts had entered their fifteenth year; municipalities owed Eskom
hundreds of billions; railways were stripped of cables and stations; ports
clogged with unshipped goods. Disinvestment became a torrent: manufacturing
output fell to its lowest level in a century, and each factory closure produced
another wave of the unemployed. A growing black middle class, frustrated by
collapsing services and shrinking opportunity, began to turn openly against the
government. In university common rooms and boardrooms alike, talk shifted from
reform to survival.
It was in
this atmosphere that a group of concerned citizens began meeting informally
under the auspices of a civic foundation. What started as discussion groups
soon evolved into something more deliberate. Participants included senior
academics, business executives, civil-rights advocates, and retired officers of
the police and military. Among them was Dr Harvey Jacobs, a respected
political scientist and social commentator whose essays had long argued that
South Africa was approaching a crisis of legitimacy. Jacobs was widely regarded
as incorruptible, intellectually formidable, and—rare among public figures—both
coloured and universally trusted.
Jacobs
warned that the social fabric was unravelling faster than the government could
respond. The unrest of 2021, he said, would look like a rehearsal for the
conflagration to come if unemployment and hunger continued to rise. In his
view, the country faced a binary choice: either the existing political order
would collapse into violence, or a new leadership would have to emerge to
impose order and initiate structural reform. His audience, initially sceptical,
began to concede that conventional politics offered no path forward.
Over the
next several months, discreet meetings multiplied. Representatives from
Afriforum, business chambers, religious councils, and university faculties
joined in. They called themselves, with cautious irony, the National Renewal
Forum. Their discussions centred not on ideology but on survival: how to
prevent South Africa from descending into a failed state. Members mapped the
country’s power structure, identifying within the SANDF and police those
officers who were professional rather than partisan, and who might act to
protect the public if the civilian administration imploded.
Outside the
Forum’s quiet deliberations, the national mood darkened. Protests over service
delivery turned violent; municipal offices burned. The government, paralysed by
factional rivalry, attempted to deflect blame onto “foreign agitators” and
“racist elements.” Inflation eroded wages; the rand slid below twenty-five to
the dollar. International lenders demanded austerity; the government responded
with slogans. When, in August 2026, the Electoral Commission announced that
municipal elections would likely be postponed for “logistical reasons,” the
reaction was explosive. Opposition parties cried foul; the press warned of
constitutional crisis. The Forum saw confirmation that the government was
clinging to power by decree.
For many of
its members the idea of intervention—once unthinkable—began to seem
unavoidable. They reasoned that the constitution’s mechanisms had been
captured, that the courts were intimidated, and that the police no longer
served the people. If South Africa were to survive, the corrupt edifice would
have to be dismantled from outside the political system itself.
Jacobs,
though cautious, concluded that moral responsibility demanded action. He
believed that a temporary assumption of authority, carried out with restraint
and directed toward restoration rather than domination, could avert civil war.
“If we fail to act,” he told his colleagues, “the streets will act for us—and
they will not act rationally.”
Thus, as
winter turned to spring in 2026, the first outlines of what would later be
called the September Intervention began to take shape—a coup conceived
not as conquest but as rescue, born from despair and the conviction that a
nation on the brink could still be saved from itself.
(Written with help from ChatGPT)
c
No comments:
Post a Comment